Maximizing R&D Incentives: The Difference Between a Standard and a Customized Approach

The ability to invest in Research and Development (R&D) has become one of the main differentiators between companies that lead and those that merely follow the market. However, access to SIFIDE is often limited by a purely administrative approach. The true maximisation of these incentives does not lie in filling out forms, but in the depth of a personalised analysis that knows how to identify innovation where it often seems invisible.

The "invisible" innovation trap

Many organisations operate under the misconception that R&D only exists in high-tech laboratories or in scientific discoveries on a global scale. This reductive view leads to countless process improvement projects, new prototype development, or manufacturing system optimisation being left out of applications.

A standard approach focuses only on what is evident. A personalised approach, however, based on multidisciplinary teams crossing engineering skills with financial expertise, allows finding what we often cannot see with the naked eye, and which can completely change a company's ability to benefit from an R&D benefit or incentive. It is in this detailed analysis that eligible activities (such as resolving technological uncertainties or developing internal tools) are identified that would go unnoticed by a less specialised eye. Failing to perform this analysis can lead to the impediment of the company's growth cycles.

Compliance as a guarantee of success

In a scenario where the rigour of audits and the demands of the National Innovation Agency (ANI) are increasing, the quality of the technical report is what determines the approval or exclusion of an application. A standard approach tends to be generic, which increases the risk of rejection due to lack of clarity.

"On the contrary, personalised consultancy is dedicated to building a robust technical and tax dossier, where every euro invested is supported by a solid technical narrative and in full compliance with current legislation."

This security has not only an immediate financial value: it has a notorious and strategic value before regulatory entities.

The value of multidisciplinary specialisation

Ultimately, maximising R&D incentives is not a mere exercise in documentary compliance or accounting management, but a management decision with a direct impact on the organisation's financial robustness. The difference between a standard approach and a personalised approach is reflected in the ability to convert every technical challenge overcome into a tangible tax asset. Opting for generic support means, most of the time, leaving legitimate investments out and exposing the company to compliance risks that can result in costly tax corrections.

On the other hand, a strategy designed to measure that combines the exhaustive identification of internal activities with the combination of financial incentives and tax benefits, allows the company to operate at a higher level of efficiency. This sophistication in managing benefits like SIFIDE ensures that innovation is not a cost, but a liquidity engine capable of financing new growth cycles.

Yunit Consulting: Together, let's make the Leap

Last update: 13/01/2026